From manual work to
software that does it
I automate the work a system should be doing and build the software underneath it. As a technical partner, not as hired capacity.
Hired help or a technical partner?
Hiring capacity solves a workload problem. A partner removes the work that should not have been there.
Two clear services
Start with a review, grow into a partnership. Anything outside those two we simply talk through.
Technical review
Know in 3 weeks where your software stands: codebase, architecture and security examined, with priorities and a one-page roadmap.
More about the reviewTechnical partnership
I learn how your processes work, take the manual labour out of them and make the technical decisions that otherwise keep getting postponed. A fixed monthly fee, no timesheets, something going live every month.
More about partnershipWhy this works
Good code is the minimum. The difference is in what you build, and in what order.
The work first, the code second
I sit with the people doing it by hand before I build anything. Otherwise you automate the wrong thing, neatly.
One process at a time
Every improvement goes live alongside what is already running, and can be rolled back on its own. No company ever goes down for an improvement.
AI where it pays, a script where that is better
AI is a means, not a goal. If a simple script does it cheaper and more reliably, it becomes a script.
Built and live
From AI platforms to legacy migrations.
Looking for a technical partner?
One conversation and you know where you stand. Also if the conclusion is that you don't need me.